Biologic therapies have fundamentally changed the treatment landscape for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. This article looks at where biologics fit alongside surgery — and how that balance is shifting.

Venenatis sollicitudin posuere elit consequat et enim. Neque tortor amet dictum tempor. Leo facilisis aliquet viverra scelerisque eleifend viverra est. At massa erat vel amet enim laoreet dictum pellentesque. Urna cursus quam pulvinar tellus. Duis fermentum nibh volutpat morbi. Et ac sed ultricies ut nunc sodales lectus. Ultricies pharetra mauris eget pellentesque accumsan tincidunt. Orci hendrerit cursus est.
Et urna ac et maecenas fusce amet. Nibh nec commodo massa sed. Tincidunt porttitor in pharetra egestas sit neque ac lacus. Amet a nunc et cum. Odio at volutpat volutpat in leo eget ipsum diam elementum. Erat magna arcu orci lorem senectus orci fringilla. Tincidunt metus nisl vitae maecenas pretium aliquet. At id pharetra in vestibulum lectus pellentesque venenatis molestie. Nibh ut facilisis.

Cursus curabitur euismod vel fermentum sapien non dolor odio vel. Tortor lectus mauris in praesent a tincidunt nam. In aenean odio aliquet pretium viverra elit quis magna. Eget ut risus posuere velit purus nisi nec sollicitudin. Tellus enim interdum neque sit vestibulum lacus. Nam pulvinar a lectus justo aliquet integer amet.
“Sed id mi eget urna facilisis pharetra. Nunc viverra est at magna maximus consectetur. Sed nec maximus augue. Aliquam commodo sem eu nisl efficitur venenatis. Proin eu suscipit lorem. Nam vitae aliquet augue. Morbi rutrum ultrices lorem molestie suscipit. Sed mattis luctus odio eu porta.”
Sed non quis tellus velit orci. Quam sed mauris elementum tempor viverra. Luctus semper risus ipsum id diam praesent. Pretium eget mauris ultrices curabitur sed sem amet. Erat nulla habitant in mattis massa mi adipiscing ullamcorper condimentum. Erat quisque integer tincidunt ac amet tempor vulputate tristique. Venenatis neque odio a nulla iaculis euismod etiam.
Sed non quis tellus velit orci. Quam sed mauris elementum tempor viverra. Luctus semper risus ipsum id diam praesent. Pretium eget mauris ultrices curabitur sed sem amet. Erat nulla habitant in mattis massa mi adipiscing ullamcorper condimentum. Erat quisque integer tincidunt ac amet tempor vulputate tristique. Venenatis neque odio a nulla iaculis euismod etiam.
Sed non quis tellus velit orci. Quam sed mauris elementum tempor viverra. Luctus semper risus ipsum id diam praesent. Pretium eget mauris ultrices curabitur sed sem amet. Erat nulla habitant in mattis massa mi adipiscing ullamcorper condimentum. Erat quisque integer tincidunt ac amet tempor vulputate tristique. Venenatis neque odio a nulla iaculis euismod etiam.
How biologics changed the treatment conversation
For decades, functional endoscopic sinus surgery was the default next step once medical therapy failed in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation have introduced a genuine alternative — one that can reduce polyp burden and symptom severity without a single incision. This has shifted the conversation from "surgery versus medication" to a more nuanced question of sequencing and patient selection.
Choosing between biologics and surgery — or both
In practice, the decision is rarely binary. Some patients respond well to biologics alone; others benefit from surgery first to improve drug delivery and access, followed by biologics to maintain control. Understanding which patients fall into which category — based on polyp burden, comorbidities, and prior surgical history — is becoming an essential skill for any rhinologist.
What this means for surgical training
As biologics become more widely used, surgeons need to understand not just how to operate, but when not to — and how surgical anatomy changes in patients who have already been on biologic therapy. This evolving picture is exactly why up-to-date, faculty-led discussion of biologics belongs alongside hands-on surgical training, not apart from it.